Merry Christmas to me

I haven't really had an opportunity to use it. My delivery was delayed due to weather. Ordered on December 2nd, it shipped on the 16th and was held up until after Christmas. Build date is December 7th, 2021.
It arrived at 5 in the evening and I had the base built and assembled in an hour. Wheeled the unit to the gazebo and that's where it sat until last weekend.
I did an initial burn in. Used a graduated approach to raising the temps. Currently doing a 2nd burn in at 350 and 450.
Then I will cook a pork roast on it.
Keep in mind, I was nit disappointed with my Traeger, my IW650 just wasn't big enough. So my comparisons are just my opinion based on having both grills.
I do realize that the comparison below is relative to each grill. The cost difference between the two doesn't make this fair to begin with. But it doesn't eliminate the Traeger in all of the views below
Boxing, both grills get the thumbs up on packaging. I would probably give Traeger the advantage on this. Mainly because they supplied the tools required in the box. They also used some forethought on making the box usable for a kids fort. Kudos to them for that.
Assembly, slight advantage Yoder. Mainly because there are less parts to assemble to set it up. Aside from that both grills had parts identified and laid out well.
Internet connection. I didn't have any trouble with either grill. Both were simple to hook up to my 2.4ghz network. Yoder was just a matter of 'adding' it to my existing account/app. For me, this one is a tie.
Hopper, I will give Traeger a clear win on their design (this is based on having the finger guard removed on my hopper). The hopper on the Yoder seems shallow and I think at 20 LBS it would be quite full. I believe both grills will have the same tunneling issue. I haven't had any issues with my Traeger because I check on it all the time. I will do the same with the Yoder.
Racks/grate. Definitely Yoder on this. Components are heavy and well made. There won't be any flexing from the weight of stuff placed on it
Start up. No question, the Yoder is better. Their ceramic igniter has the pellets ignited so quickly. A lot faster than the Traeger.
Pellet consumption, Traeger will get the win here. But in fairness it has been colder out than any temps I have used my Traeger at. Not a fair comparison, but worth noting for now.
Maintaining temperatures, they both do well at that. I think the Traeger may fluctuate a bit more, but I don't see that as a real issue.
Smoke. This one I can't speak to fully until I have more time on the Yoder. I haven't had issues getting smoke out of my Traeger. So far I am seeing the same on the Yoder. If I had to make a comparison, the Yoder has a more consistent smoke. My Traeger would go through cycles of smoke/no visible smoke. Flavor and actual output I will update more as I get to use it.
Shutdown. They both function the same and no clear advantage there other than the Traeger app is a bit more polished than the Fireboard app. I do like that you can add cook programs into the Yoder. You can have it change temps based on time or temperature probe readings. I have no issues with the FB app, so I would give the advantage to FB/Yoder. But that is relative, as they both do what they were intended to do.
Build. The Yoder is a solid tank. The Traeger is well constructed as well. I guess this would be subject to what you prefer. I prefer the Yoder here, not unhappy with the Traeger. JMHO
Clean up. Yoder wins this one. If you want to cook again without vacuuming, the firepot is easily accessible with the removable door on the deflector plate. Just dump out the firepot into the cook chamber and start a new cook. Removing the grates and drip tray in the Yoder makes you realize the difference in the build qualities. It's drip tray is heavy and doesn't flex at all. Vacuuming is easy to do as well. But the Traeger was easy to vacuum as well.
I will post more on the grilling options on the Yoder once I get to use it. Having the door above the firepot removable will be beneficial in getting a good sear at temperature. I feel that will be a win for the Yoder
Keep in mind these are my opinions from actually having both grills. Not looking to debate someone else's 'thoughts' based on what they think based on what they have read or seen on YouTube.
20220108_123325.jpg20220108_123353.jpg20220108_123407.jpg20220108_135433.jpg20220108_135417.jpg

Last picture is the smoke at 450°F set temperature, after running for an hour
 
Last edited:
First cook was an amazing success
I cooked at 225°F for an hour and then 325°F until the pork roast was done (about 1.5 hours). Temperature held steady at both those set temps +/- 10 °F
The whole time this cooked there was thin blue smoke rolling out of the stack. I used the Pit Boss Charcoal Blend pellets. There was a definite smoke flavor on the roast. More so than when I used those dame pellets on the Traeger..
I am very happy with the Yoder so far....honeymoon stage? We will see
20220108_151444.jpg20220108_161755.jpg20220108_175228.jpg20220108_181456.jpg20220108_181848.jpg

GF suggested we keep the Traeger too. Sounded like a great idea to me, so I agreed
 
Good Job
 
First cook was an amazing success
I cooked at 225°F for an hour and then 325°F until the pork roast was done (about 1.5 hours). Temperature held steady at both those set temps +/- 10 °F
The whole time this cooked there was thin blue smoke rolling out of the stack. I used the Pit Boss Charcoal Blend pellets. There was a definite smoke flavor on the roast. More so than when I used those dame pellets on the Traeger..
I am very happy with the Yoder so far....honeymoon stage? We will see
View attachment 8135View attachment 8136View attachment 8137View attachment 8138View attachment 8139

GF suggested we keep the Traeger too. Sounded like a great idea to me, so I agreed
Excellent.
 
First cook was an amazing success
I cooked at 225°F for an hour and then 325°F until the pork roast was done (about 1.5 hours). Temperature held steady at both those set temps +/- 10 °F
The whole time this cooked there was thin blue smoke rolling out of the stack. I used the Pit Boss Charcoal Blend pellets. There was a definite smoke flavor on the roast. More so than when I used those dame pellets on the Traeger..
I am very happy with the Yoder so far....honeymoon stage? We will see
View attachment 8135View attachment 8136View attachment 8137View attachment 8138View attachment 8139

GF suggested we keep the Traeger too. Sounded like a great idea to me, so I agreed
RustyJake

Appreciate the many pictures and details from you last two posts. Love to hear the "thin blue smoke" was rolling out of the stack. Keep us posted on the following cooks. I love to hear how it does with a full packer brisket and a turkey as well.

We are very happy for you with the added Yoder. Sounds like you are also blessed with a Great GF who suggested keeping the Traeger as well. What a great idea that you were wise to agree with. :unsure: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 
I'm next!!!!!
 
Rusty you ever put the charcoal pellets in smoke tube
 
Rusty you ever put the charcoal pellets in smoke tube
Yes, I personally find the flavor profile is light on them. But mine are both 'blends' . So that may affect their overall smoke. The Lumberjack definitely has a smokier profile.
I love the flavor off of my charcoal Weber, and like pellet vs. stick, you just don't achieve that same effect.
My first cook on the Yoder was using rhe Pit Boss Charcoal Blend, and I definitely noticed a smoke flavor and scent from the pork. I couldn't sense any charcoal BBQ taste though. Just my thoughts on it. I am a firm believer that a lot of what we find from the different pellets is a personal perspective and not necessarily what another person may find.
I am going to try and narrow down my pellet selection to just a few. I have too many types now and I just need to determine the ones I prefer and stick to those.
 
Last edited:
I couldn't sense any charcoal BBQ taste though. Just my thoughts on it. I am a firm believer that a lot of what we find from the different pellets is a personal perspective and not necessarily what another person may find.
smiley-signs011.gif
 
So.....find yourself using the Yoder or Ironwood more on a daily basis?
 
Just did a brisket cook
So.....find yourself using the Yoder or Ironwood more on a daily basis?
I have been using the Yoder only since i got it. Mainly because of how things are set up for me in my gazebo right now over winter. I haven't figured out where the Traeger can go yet.
I do like how the clean up on it seems so much easier to do. Maybe a bigger Traeger is easier to clean as well, I don't know. Everything seems easier to access inside the Yoder
Not that this comparison is fair due to the size difference and it being winter, the pellet consumption on the Yoder is more than the Traeger, it is about 1.5 Lbs/hour right now. Adds to the cost on doing anything, especially overnight cooks. So pellet consumption is a win on the Traeger. But I believe this is relative to the size difference and the cooler temps outside. In my opinion, the pellet hopper design on the Yoder isn't as good as the Traeger. I am seeing far more tunneling on it than I ever did with the Traeger. I don't see a lot of posts about it being an issue for others online, but I have seen some form of it on every cook.
I am still happy with the Yoder. I am looking forward to summer when I can situate things better and hopefully do a side by side cook on either a brisket, pulled pork or ribs
 
Just did a brisket cook
I have been using the Yoder only since i got it. Mainly because of how things are set up for me in my gazebo right now over winter. I haven't figured out where the Traeger can go yet.
I do like how the clean up on it seems so much easier to do. Maybe a bigger Traeger is easier to clean as well, I don't know. Everything seems easier to access inside the Yoder
Not that this comparison is fair due to the size difference and it being winter, the pellet consumption on the Yoder is more than the Traeger, it is about 1.5 Lbs/hour right now. Adds to the cost on doing anything, especially overnight cooks. So pellet consumption is a win on the Traeger. But I believe this is relative to the size difference and the cooler temps outside. In my opinion, the pellet hopper design on the Yoder isn't as good as the Traeger. I am seeing far more tunneling on it than I ever did with the Traeger. I don't see a lot of posts about it being an issue for others online, but I have seen some form of it on every cook.
I am still happy with the Yoder. I am looking forward to summer when I can situate things better and hopefully do a side by side cook on either a brisket, pulled pork or ribs
looking forward to your you tube channel comp videos
 
Are you seeing much difference in cooks between the Traeger and Yoder? Any more smoke? More even cooks?

Easier to clean?

I’m really looking hard at those.
 
Are you seeing much difference in cooks between the Traeger and Yoder? Any more smoke? More even cooks?

Easier to clean?

I’m really looking hard at those.
I am finding I am cooking more at 225° than before. I get as much smoke as the Traeger super smoke, but at higher temps. Flavors are the same from the pellets. It is mild still. I have yet to use a smoke tube in it. Haven't felt the need, even on my brisket last weekend.
Cleaning it is far easier for me than the Traeger. It may be the extra room, but accessibility is much easier.
 
Last edited:

Latest Discussions

Back
Top